|
|
| word looked up : | home / archive |
Animal rights : Animal welfareAnimal rights is the term commonly used for the view that animals are worthy of ethical consideration.While many advocates of animal rights do support rights for animals in the strict philosophical or legal sense, the term primarily is used for the notion that animals should not be killed for food, imprisoned, experimented upon, or abused for entertainment.
| |||
Among the most famous philosophical proponents of animal rights are the philosophers Peter Singer and Tom Regan[?], who hold views that have much in common, but with different philosophical justifications (see below). Activists Karen Davis of United Poultry Concerns and Ingrid Newkirk[?] of PETA have also eloquently defined fully-fledged political/personal philosophies of animal rights.
Although Singer is said to be one of the ideological founders of today's animal rights movement, his philosophical approach to an animal's moral status isn't based on the concept of rights, but on the principle of equal consideration of interests. His seminal book, Animal Liberation[?], argues that humans grant moral consideration to other humans not on the basis of intelligence (in the instance of children, or the mentally disabled), on ability to moralize (criminals and the insane), or on any other attribute that is inherently human, but rather on their ability to experience suffering. As animals also experience suffering, he argues, excluding animals from such consideration is a form of discrimination he calls 'speciesism'.
Tom Regan, on the other side, claims that non-human animals that are so-called "subjects-of-a-life" are bearers of rights like humans, although not necessarily of the same degree. This means that animals in this class have "inherent value" as individuals, and cannot merely be considered as means for an end. This is also called a "direct duty" view on the moral status of non-human animals. According to Regan we should abolish the breeding of animals for food, animal experimentation and commercial hunting.
These two figures serve to illustrate the main differences within the animal rights movement. While Singer is primarily concerned with improving treatment of animals and accepts that, at least in some hypothetical scenarios, animals could be legitimately used for further (human or non-human) ends, Regan relies on the strict "Kantian" idea that animals are persons and ought never to be sacrificed as mere means. Yet, despite these theoretical discrepancies, both Singer and Regan mostly agree about what to do in practice: for instance, they both concur in that the adoption of a vegan diet and the abolition of nearly all forms of animal experimentation[?] are ethically mandatory. Those who want to antagonize the "rights" and the "welfarist" approaches should remember the words of Noam Chomsky, who, quoting Dewey (in another context), said that
[it is correct that] mere "attenuation of the shadow will not change the substance", but it can create the basis for undermining the substance. It goes back to the Brazilian rural worker's image [of] expanding the floor of the cage. Eventually you wan to dismantle the cage, but expanding the floor of the cage is a step towards that.
Generally speaking, animals have been denied the same rights as human beings and corporations. However, animals are protected under the law in many jurisdictions. There are criminal laws against cruelty to animals, laws that regulate the keeping of animals in cities and on farms, transit of animals internationally quarrantine and inspection provisions. Generally speaking, these laws are designed to protect animals, or protect human interaction with animals, or regulate the use of animals as food or in food processing. In the common law it is possible to create a trust and have the trust empowered to see to the care of a particular animal after the death of the benefactor of the trust. Some eccentric wealthy individuals without children create such trusts in their will. Such trusts can be upheld by the courts if properly drafted and the testator was of sound mind. There are also many movements to give animals greater rights and protection under domestic and international law.
See also: veganism, vegetarianism, anti-vivisection[?], ahimsa, Animal Liberation Front[?], imitation meat, in vitro meat, American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
and his political.html">political intrigues during a memorable epoch in the history of
diplomatists in Europe. Versed in many languages, a classical student,
familiar with its usages, accustomed to associate with dignity and tact
letters; endowed with a facile tongue, a fluent pen, and an eye.html">eye and ear
and singular aptitude for secret and intricate affairs;--he had by the
years at the court of Henry the Great been able to render inestimable
distinguished lineage, not a Hollander, but a Belgian by birth, son of
important post, he had been brought forward from a youth by Barneveld and
and his own eminent talents he had now achieved the highest honours.
He had enjoyed the intimacy and even the confidence of Henry IV., so far
friendly relations and familiar access to the King gave him political
Advocate of Holland, he always gratefully and copiously acknowledged the
traverse by so powerful and active an intellect. I have seldom alluded
position, negotiation, and opinion of the envoy--and the reader has seen
of Aerssens is full to overflowing of gratitude, respect, fervent
high character of the Advocate.
There can be no question of Aerssen's consummate abilities. Whether his
had the ring of true gold or not, time would show. Hitherto Barneveld
had ceased to exist. A duller eye than that of Aerssens could have seen
been converted, for a long time to come at least, into a Spanish
with the Infanta Anna, and of his sister with the Infante, one day to be
knife of Ravaillac had been employed. The condition precedent to those
.
On
wordlookup.net
All is still licensed under the GNU FDL.
It uses material from the wikipedia.
|
|