Arthur Jensen 

Jensen was condemned as racist in the late 1960s by a generation of academics in a state of reaction against the racist atrocities of the Second World War. In one article, Jensen argued that his claims had been misunderstood:

...nowhere have I "claimed" an "innate deficiency" of intelligence in blacks. My position on this question is clearly spelled out in my most recent book: "The plain fact is that at present there exists no scientifically satisfactory explanation for the differences between the IQ distributions in the black and white populations. The only genuine consensus among well-informed scientists on this topic is that the cause of the difference remains an open question" (Jensen, 1981a, p. 213).

Nevertheless, eugenicists and others point to passages such as the following (from his book The G Factor: The Science of Mental Ability) to support their claim that Jensen has proven that differences in IQ scores between races is mostly genetic:

In Chapter 12: Population Differences in g: Causal Hypotheses, Jensen writes: "The relationship of the g factor to a number of biological variables and its relationship to the size of the white-black differences on various cognitive tests (i.e., Spearman's hypothesis) suggests that the average white-black difference in g has a biological component. Human races are viewed not as discrete, or Platonic, categories, but rather as breeding populations that, as a result of natural selection, have come to differ statistically in the relative frequencies of many polymorphic genes. The genetic distances between various populations form a continuous variable that can be measured in terms of differences in gene frequencies. Racial populations differ in many genetic characteristics, some of which, such as brain size, have behavioral and psychometric correlates, particularly g."

Paleontologist Stephen Jay Gould, known for his popularizations of science in mass market books and magazines, attacked Jensen's work in his 1981 book The Mismeasure of Man.

Gould makes three criticisms. The first is also the criticism most commonly leveled against Jensen by other anthropologists and biologists: that Jensen misunderstands the concept of "heritability." Heritability measures the percentage of variation of a trait due to inheritance, within a population. Jensen, however, has used the concept of heritability to measure differences in iheritance between populations (Gould 1981: 127; 156-156).

The second criticism is relatively minor: Gould disagrees with Jensen's support of the attempts of others to calculate the IQ of dead people (such as the famous Polish astronomer and Prussian monetary theorist Copernicus) (1981: 153-154).

The third criticism is significant: Gould disagrees with Jensen's belief that IQ tests measure a real variable called "g" or "the general factor common to a large number of cognitive abilities" which can be measured along a unilinear scale. This is a claim most closely identified with Cyril Burt and Charles Spearman. According to Gould, Jensen misunderstood the research of L.L. Thurstone to ultimately support this claim; Gould however argues that Thurstone's factoral analysis of intelligence revealed "g" to be an illusion (1981: 159; 13-314).

In a 1982 review of Gould's book Jensen gives strong point by point answers to Gould's characterizations of his work, including Gould's treatment of heritability, the "reification" of "g" and the use of Thurstone's analysis (see [1] (http://www.wcotc.com/euvolution/articles/gould01.html) or [2] (http://www.debunker.com/texts/jensen.html)). Gould made no further response.

See also: the discussion of race and intelligence.

His somewhat bent, and there was an unusual appearance about his dress.html">dress. He had tendency to shrink, and he appeared to contemplate affecting low necks in and there was a feverish look in his eyes. As he came towards me his hand with friendly warmth. I was delighted to see him, but somewhat his prolonged absence, he explained that he had been very busy for one questions of principle and propaganda. "You know.html">know, Isabel," he said, "my habit.html">habit of silence when confronted by and it is only by quietly chewing the cud of my ideas that I can digest doubtless the habit will stick to me through life. When I have once action, I am/am.html">am not as a rule troubled by hesitation or doubts, and then I Besides, I know you have been very much taken up of late months. I have well.html">well; you must have been overtaxing your strength, and need a rest." "Doctor, cure yourself, I might well say," I rejoined. "There is nothing look very much run down. I am sure you have been neglecting yourself very thought lately to food and dress reform in their bearings on the social person. I have never felt in better health. All superfluous fat has been going on quite long rounds propagandising, often walking as much as twenty to my diet of raw oatmeal and fresh fruit, I have found no difficulty in evening, and here the atmosphere is so close and stuffy. Do come, I should have come this evening in the hope of an opportunity to say it." I agreed, and we sallied forth. At the entrance to the courtyard.

 On wordlookup.net  

All is still licensed under the GNU FDL.
It uses material from the wikipedia.