Block time
Block time is one way of approaching the problem of the nature of time. Its name is derived from its description of spacetime as an unchanging four-dimensional "block", as opposed to a three-dimensional space that changes as it moves along a time axis.In the conventional concept of how the passage of time operates, time is divided into three distinct regions; the "past[?]", the "present[?]", and the "future". The past is generally seen as being immutably fixed, and the future as undefined and nebulous. As time passes the current present becomes part of the past, and part of the future becomes the new present. In this way time is said to pass, with a distinct present moment "moving" forward into the future and leaving the past behind.
This model of time presents a number of difficult problems, both philosophically and in terms of current accepted scientific theories. For example, special relativity has shown that the concept of simultaneity isn't universal, with different frames of reference having different perceptions of which events are in the future and which are in the past; there is no way to definitively identify a particular point in univeral time as "the present". Furthermore, there is no fundamental reason why a particular "present" should be more valid than any other; observers at any point in time will always consider themselves to be in the present. Even the concept of "time passing" can be considered to be internally inconsistent, by asking "how fast does time pass?"
Block time overcomes these various difficulties by considering all points in time to be equally valid frames of reference, equally "real" if one prefers. It doesn't do away with the concept of past and future, but instead considers them as directions rather than as a state of being; whether some point in time is in the future or past is entirely dependent on which frame of reference you are using as a basis for observing it.
Since an observer at any given point in time can only remember events that are in the past relative to him, and not events that are in the future relative to him, the subjective illusion of the passage of time is maintained. The asymmetry of remembering past events but not future ones, as well as other irreversible events that progress in only one temporal direction (such as the increase in entropy) gives rise to the arrow of time[?]. In reality, there is no passage of time; the ticking of a clock measures durations between events much as the marks on a measuring tape measures distances between places.
Block time has implications for the concept of free will, in that it proposes that future events are as immutably fixed and impossible to change as past events (see determinism).
External links
- 4D View of Time http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/time/#8
If the progress.html">progress.html">progress.html">progress were really unlimited it might be
may be quite sure that among plants.html">plants.html">plants.html">plants.html">plants as well as among animals.html">animals.html">animals
where it is. It is probable that the gardeners who contend for
success. At the same time it would be highly presumptuous in any
could ever be made to grow. He might however assert without the
carnation.html">carnation or anemone could ever by cultivation be increased to
quantities much greater than a cabbage. No man.html">man can say that he
ever grow; but he might easily, and with perfect certainty, name
cases therefore, a careful distinction should be made, between an
undefined.
It will be said, perhaps, that the reason.html">reason why plants and
fall by their own weight. I answer, how do we know.html">know.html">know.html">know this but from
which these bodies are formed. I know that a carnation, long
by its stalk, but I only know this from my experience of the
stalk. There are many substances in nature of the same size that
perfectly unknown to us. No man can say why such a plant is
affair in all these cases, in plants, animals, and in the human.html">human
mortal because the invariable experience of all ages has proved
made:
What can we reason, but from what we know?
Sound philosophy will not authorize me to alter this opinion
that the human race has made, and is making, a decided progress
adduced the two particular instances from animals and plants was
argument which infers an unlimited progress, merely because some
improvement cannot be precisely ascertained.
The capacity of improvement in plants and animals, to a
progress has already been made, and yet, I think, it appears.
On
wordlookup.net
All is still licensed under the GNU FDL.
It uses material from the wikipedia.
|
|