|
|
| word looked up : | home / archive |
Copenhagen interpretationThe Copenhagen interpretation is the mainstream interpretation of quantum mechanics; it was worked out by Niels Bohr and Werner Heisenberg while collaborating in Copenhagen around 1927. The interpretation attempts to answer some perplexing questions which arise as a result of the wave-particle duality in quantum mechanics.In the classic double-slit experiment, when light passes through double slits onto a screen, alternate bands of bright and dark regions are produced. These can be explained as areas in which the light waves reinforce or cancel. However, in the late 19th century, it became experimentally apparent that light has some particle-like properties and items such as electrons have wave like properties and can also produce interference patterns. This poses some interesting questions. Suppose one were to do the double slit experiment and reduce the light so that only one photon (or electron) passes through the slits at a time. In performing the experiment, one will see the electron or photon hit the screen one at a time. However, when one totals up where the photons have hit, one will see interference patterns that appear to be the result of interfering waves even though the experiment dealt with one particle at a time. The questions this experiment poses are
The Copenhagen interpretation answers these questions as follows:
| |||
The completeness of quantum mechanics (thesis 1) has been attacked by the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen thought experiment which was intended to show that there have to be hidden variables in order to avoid non-local, instantaneous "effects at a distance". Bell's inequality about the measurement outcomes of such an experiment was derived on the assumption that these hidden variables exist and no non-local effects are present. In 1982, Aspect finally carried out the experiment and found Bell's inequality to be violated. This experiment has since been criticized and improved experiments have been described by Weihs and Rowe, confirming Aspect's results. These results show that interpretations which postulate locally acting hidden variables, in a sense precisely defined by Bell, are untenable.
Of the three theses above, the third is maybe the most problematic from a physicist's standpoint, because it gives a special status to measurement processes without cleanly defining them nor explaining their peculiar effects. However, in contrast to some incorrect popularizations of quantum mechanics, it isn't believed that the measurement process involves consciousness. It can be demonstrated that the collapse of the wave function occurs when the wave function encounters a non-conscious measurement instrument. In fact, this characteristic of quantum mechanics has practical uses in quantum cryptography.
Many physicists and philosophers have objected to the Copenhagen interpretation, both on the grounds that it is non-deterministic and that it includes an undefined measurement process that converts probability functions into non-probabilistic measurements. Einstein's quotes "God doesn't play dice" and "Do you really think the moon isn't there if you aren't looking at it?" exemplify this. Schrödinger's cat was originally intended as an example to show how absurd the model was. Other physicists are even blunter; David Deutsch accuses the Copenhagen interpretation of being meaningless gibberish.
Many physicists have subscribed to the null interpretation of quantum mechanics summarized by Feynman's famous dictum: "Shut up and calculate!"
Since the 1980s, theoretical developments such as quantum entanglement and quantum superposition have given some support to interpretations such as the Everett many-worlds interpretation. This interpretation is preferred by some theoreticians working in fundamental physics and cosmology. Nevertheless, in the absence of observational evidence which can distinguish between Copenhagen and many-worlds, the choice between them is viewed as one of personal taste. Most physicists find this situation unsatisfactory, and the creation of experiments which can distinguish between the intepretations of quantum mechanics is an active area of research. One dramatic but highly impractical experiment that would distinguish the two is the quantum suicide experiment proposed by Max Tegmark.
the city, and I seemed to consider it as a confirmation of my liberty; I
military accouterment; I followed processions, and was pleased with the
I approached with awe, but seeing others enter, I followed their example,
carried under my arm; be that as it may, I conceived a high opinion of my
inhabitant there. The weather was hot; I had walked about till I was
milk-house; they brought me some cream-cheese curds and whey, and two
for five.html">five or six.html">six sous I had one of the most delicious meals I ever
Piedmontese language to make myself understood, this was a work of no
rather to the state of my purse than the bent of my inclinations. In the
street, furnished lodgings to servants out of place at only one sou a
it. She was young and newly married, though she already had five or six
and it continued thus while I remained there. She was good-natured,
gentle heart, was officious; and to me both kind and serviceable.
For several days I gave myself up to the pleasures of independence and
examining every.html">every object that seemed curious or new; and, indeed, most
the court, and assisted regularly every morning at the king's mass.
and his retinue; but my passion for music, which now began to make its
which, soon seen and always the same, presently lost its attraction.
Desjardins, and the Bezuzzi shone there alternately; all these were not
instrument, provided it was just, transported with joy. Magnificence
of it, my thoughts were principally employed in observing whether any
the heroine of a romance.
Meantime, I was on the point of beginning one; in a less elevated sphere,
.
On
wordlookup.net
All is still licensed under the GNU FDL.
It uses material from the wikipedia.
|
|