word looked up : home / archive

 Derangement 

In combinatorics, a derangement is a permutation φ of a set S with the property that for all x in S, φ(x) ≠ x. A frequent problem is to count the number of derangements as a function of n = |S|, often with additional constraints.

Derangements arise in a number of guises in combinatorial problems. For example, each solution to the rooks problem[?], where n rooks must be placed on an n x n chessboard such that no two rooks occupy the same row or column, can be considered as a derangment of n elements. Another version of the problem arises when we ask for the number of ways n letters, each addressed to a different person, can be placed in n pre-addressed envelopes so that no letter appears in the correctly addressed envelope.

One approach to counting the derangements of n elements is to use induction. First, note that if φn is any derangement of the natural numbers [1,n], then for some k in [1,n-1], φn(n) = k. Then if we let (k,n) be the permutation of [1,n] which swaps k and n, and we let φn-1 be the composition ((k,n) o φn); then φn-1(n) = n, and either:

  • φn-1(k) ≠ k, so φn-1 is a derangement of [1,n-1], or
  • φn-1(k) = k, and for all xk, φn-1(x) ≠ x.
In the latter case, φn-1 is then a derangement of the set [1, n-1] excluding k; i.e., the composition φn-2 = ((k,n-1) o φn-1 o (k,n-1)) is a derangement of [1,n-2].

As examples of these two cases, consider the following two derangements of 6 elements as we perform the above described swaps:

       514623 -> (51432)6; and
       315624 -> (31542)6 -> (3142)56

The above described correspondences are 1-to-1. The converse is also true; there are exactly (n-1) ways of converting any derangement of n-1 elements into a derangement of n elements, and (n-1) ways of converting any derangement of n-2 elements into a derangement of n elements. For example, if n = 6 and k = 4, we can perform the following conversions of derangements of length 5 and 4, respectively

       51432 -> 514326 -> 514623; and
       3142  -> 31542  -> 315426 -> 315624

Thus, if we write dn as the number of derangements of n letters, and we define d0 = 1, d1 = 0; then dn satisfies the recurrence:

dn = (n-1)(dn-1 + dn-2)

Using this recurrence, it can be shown that, in the limit,

limn→∞ dn = n! / e

and the probability pn = dn/n! that a randomly selected permutation is a derangement is

limn→∞ pn = 1/e ~ 0.3679

and in fact, the probability approaches this limit quite quickly.

Generalizations

Derangements are an example of the wider field of constrained permutations. For example, the ménage problem[?] asks if n married couples are seated boy-girl-boy-girl-... around a circular table, how many ways can they be seated so that no man is seated next to his wife?

More formally, given sets A and S, and some sets U and V of surjections AS, we often wish to know the number of pairs of functions (f,g) such that f is in U and g is in V, and for all a in A, f(a) ≠ g(a); in other words, where for each f and g, there exists a derangement φ of S such that f(a) = φ(g(a)).

External Links

  • Sloan's Integer Sequence A000166 (http://www.research.att.com/cgi-bin/access.cgi/as/njas/sequences/eisA.cgi?Anum=000166)
  • Non-sexist solution of the ménage problem (http://hilbert.dartmouth.edu/~doyle/docs/menage/menage/menage.html), Kenneth P. Bogart, Peter G. Doyle

To enter quietly of a rival, and to have avoided being seen by the soldiers, is an event obstacles, the desire of seeing you is able to effect much greater which kept me away from you; to allay the pangs which nearly kill me, I inestimable person. I come, therefore, to tell you that I return thanks in the midst of that happiness, I feel that I shall always be tortured performing such a noble.html">noble deed, and has unjustly given to my rival the service. Yes, Madam, my readiness to free you from your chains was Heaven had not robbed me of that honour. ELV. I know, my Lord, that you possess a heart capable of overcoming the to espouse my quarrel, would have enabled you, as well as any one else, noble deed--and you could have done it--I am already under.

 On wordlookup.net  

All is still licensed under the GNU FDL.
It uses material from the wikipedia.



logo

navig stuff

home
archive