Free software movement 

Members of the free software movement believe the software freedoms listed on free software should apply to all software: they hold that it is immoral to prevent people from excercising these freedoms. Richard Stallman argues that non-free software is immoral because it prevents its users from learning and from helping their fellow man. There is no consensus, however, how these aims should be met. Some believe that software should be freed through legislation; others through boycotts of proprietary software. Still others believe that time will tell, as free software will eventually be technically superior to proprietary software, and will win on the free market.

On the other hand, many who prefer the term "free software" and consider themselves part of the movement do not believe proprietary software to be strictly immoral. They argue, however, that freedom is valuable (both socially and pragmatically) as a property of software in its own right, separate from technical quality in a narrow sense. Moreover, they may use the term "free software" to distance themselves from claims that "open source" software is always technically superior than proprietary software (which is often demonstrably false, at least in the short term). In this sense, they object that "open source" advocates, by concentrating solely on technical merits, encourage users to sacrifice their freedom (and the long-term benefits thereof) for short-term conveniences that proprietary software may provide.

Supporters of Open Source argue for the pragmatic virtues of free software (aka "open source software") rather than questions of morality. Their basic disagreement with the Free Software Foundation is its blanket condemnation of proprietary software. There are many programmers who enjoy supporting and using free software but make their livings developing proprietary software, and do not consider their actions immoral. By definition, Free software is a subset of Open Source software.

Many members of the Free Software Movement believe that also other materials currently subject to copyright and patent law should be freed. Some believe that some classes of works should not be freely modifiable, e.g. opinion pieces in order to prevent misrepresentation of the author's beliefs, fictional works, or licenses themselves.

See free software license, open source license.

See also: GNU Manifesto, Open source, Free Software Foundation, Hacker community

But, in truth, I do find thee thus. the gods, nor any memory of good deeds? Dost thou.html">thou.html">thou not remember how Yet it is this man.html">man.html">man's house.html">house that thou dost waste, and his son that not thy heart be troubled. The man is not, nor shall be born, who earth. Many a time hath Ulysses set me upon his knees, and given Telemachus is the dearest of men to me. fear.html">Fear not death.html">death for him plotted the death of her son. After this she went to her chamber, and wept for her lord till Athene changed Ulysses again into the likeness of a beggar man, Are the suitors come back from their ambush, or do they still questions; but I will tell what I know.html">know. The messenger from thy the news to the Queen. This also I know, that I saw.html">saw a ship spears, and shields. These, perchance, were the suitors, but I shunned. When the morning came, Telemachus said to the swineherd: "I go to face.html">face. And do thou lead this stranger to the city, that he may left here. It is better for a man to beg his bread in the town shall wax hot, for my garments are exceeding poor, and I fear lest the while. And when he came to the house his nurse Eurycleia saw chamber, and cast her arms about him, and kissed him on the face, Telemachus, light of mine eyes! I thought not ever to see.

 On wordlookup.net  

All is still licensed under the GNU FDL.
It uses material from the wikipedia.