Idempotent 

Formally, if S is a set with a binary operation * on it, then an element s of S is said to be idempotent if

s * s = s.

A function f from a set M to itself is called idempotent if f o f = f, that is, f(f(x)) = f(x) for all x in M. This is equivalent to saying that f(x) = x for all x in f(M). Trivial examples of idempotent functions on S are the identity map and the constant maps. Less trivial examples are the absolute value function of a real or complex argument, and the closure operator for a topological space X, which is an idempotent function on the power set of X.

Any matrix that projects all vectors onto a subspace (not necessarily orthogonally) is idempotent.

A ring in which multiplication is idempotent (x*x=x) is called a boolean ring. It can be shown that in every such ring, multiplication is commutative, and every element is its own additive inverse.

A special case is the use of the word "idempotent" in computing. The term "idempotent" refers to something which has the same effect if used multiple times as it does if used only once. In particular, C header files are often designed to be idempotent, that is, if the header file is included more than once (as can easily happen with nested #includes), then nothing untoward happens - the effect is the same as if it had been included only once. In HTTP, some methods (such as GET) are idempotent, while other methods (such as POST) are not.

In user interface design, a button can be called "idempotent" if pressing it more than once will have the same effect as pressing it once. For example, a "Pause" button isn't idempotent if it toggles the paused state. On the other hand, if pressing it multiple times keeps the system paused and pressing "Play" resumes, then "Pause" is idempotent. This is useful in interfaces such as infrared remote controls and touch screens where the user may not be sure of having pressed the button successfully and may press it again. Elevator call buttons are idempotent, though many people think they are not.

I say still more frequently that a town benefice--had been so cruelly support the wretched parson, and that no one could be found who would this happened the death of the previous incumbent would not appear on taken of the long vacancy when the next parson was instituted. In a numbers, it would be inevitable that the impoverished livings would of preferment filled--it would be impossible to fill such as could accepted as giving a part of the evidence with regard to the clerical certain area during a given period may appear to be, they certainly incumbents as were forthwith replaced by their successors; and, diocese the _larger the number of institutions_ recorded in a deaths among the clergy during that time. When there are more men.html">men than men there must needs be vacancies--square holes and round ones. So much for the Institution Books. With regard to the Court Rolls, registers of the deaths of the landholders within the manor.html">manor, great instances, we have no notice of any other member of the household, or off--young and old, babe and suckling, sister and brother, and aged of them involved in one hideous, horrible calamity. The steward of tenant of the manor. Was he missing? Then, who was his heir? Any the plague! Children? Kinsfolk? All gone! Their blackening.

 On wordlookup.net  

All is still licensed under the GNU FDL.
It uses material from the wikipedia.