| word looked up : | home / archive |
IncarnationThe literal meaning of Incarnation is enfleshment. The term refers to the DNA-encoding, conception, and live birth of a sentient creature (generally human) who is the material manifestation of an entity or force whose original nature is immaterial. Incarnation should, and must, be carefully distinguished from the phenomenon of apotheosis[?], which refers to the temporary manifestation of a divine or archetypal force, entity or energy within and through a human being during the course of ritual, religious exercise, meditation, or other spiritual activities.While Christianity and Hinduism are perhaps the most widely-known traditions to employ this concept within the context of their respective belief systems, they are by no means the only ones to do so.
As used in the Christian traditionThe doctrine of the Incarnation of Christ is central to the traditional Christian faith as held by the Catholic Church, the Eastern Orthodox, and most Protestants.Briefly, it is the belief that the Second Person of the Godhead, also known as the Son or the Word, "became flesh" when he was miraculously conceived in the womb of the Virgin Mary. In the Incarnation, the divine nature of the Son was perfectly united with human nature in one divine Person. This person, Jesus Christ, was both "truly God and truly man." The incarnation is commemorated and celebrated each year at the Feast of the Incarnation, also known as Christmas. The significance of the Incarnation has been extensively written about throughout Christian history. It is perhaps nowhere more beautifully summed up than in the Hymn to the Only Begotten Son in the Liturgy of St. John Chrysostom[?] used by Orthodox and Byzantine Catholic believers:
† Literally, "God-bearer." In the Western tradition usually translated "Mother of God." See Theotokos. See also:
External linkOn the Incarnation (http://www.ccel.org/a/athanasius/incarnation/0content.html) by Saint Athanasius of AlexandriaThe
from the Ode. The dialogue was ingrafted on the chorus, and
the Athenian dramatists cooperated with the circumstances under
heart, a lyric poet.html">poet. In his time, the Greeks had far more
not yet acquired that immense superiority in war, in science, and
treat the Asiatics with contempt. From the narrative of Herodotus
disciples, to Egypt and Assyria. At this period, accordingly, it
with the Oriental style. And that style, we think, is discernible
of the Hebrew writers. The book of Job, indeed, in conduct and
Considered as plays, his works are absurd; considered as
the address of Clytemnestra to Agamemnon on his return, or the
dramatic writing, we shall instantly condemn them as monstrous.
shall admit that it has never been surpassed in energy and
consistent with its original form. His portraits of men have a
but of a bas-relief. It suggests a resemblance; but it does not
further. But it was a task far beyond his powers, perhaps beyond
was excellent. He substituted crutches for stilts, bad sermons
highly than, in our opinion, Euripides deserved. Indeed the
"sad Electra's poet," sometimes remind us of the beautiful Queen
there can be no doubt that this veneration for the Athenian,
Milton taken Aeschylus for his model, he would have given himself
treasures of his mind, without bestowing a thought on those
impossible to preserve. In the attempt to reconcile things in
must have failed. We cannot identify ourselves with the
the poet, as in a good ode. The conflicting ingredients, like. All is still licensed under the GNU FDL.
|
|
|||||