Individual
In metaphysics, the word individual, while sometimes meaning "a person", more typically describes any numerically singular thing. Used in many contexts, both 'Socrates' and 'the Moon' denote individuals; 'grapefruit' and 'redness' (at least often) do not. 'Individual' as a piece of philosophical jargon is much-bandied and often to be found in the company of particular -- indeed, often treated as synonymous with 'particular' (though one wonders if abstract particulars[?] can count as individuals) -- and contrasted with 'universal'.A famous work on individuals and their individuation is by P. F. Strawson: Individuals: An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics (London: Methuen & Co. Ltd., 1959; New York: Anchor, 1963).
In everyday life an individual is some collection of thoughts and deeds that is considered an entity. Many people consider an individual responsible for its actions.
What collection of thoughts and deeds is considered an individual depends on perspective. For example, the thoughts and deeds of one body may be considered one individual.
However, it happens that after accidents and illnesses that caused brain damage, the thoughts and deeds from one body become so drastically different that many people don't feel that that body holds the same individual.
Some people talk about elderly people or handicapped or ill or poor people without the slightest regard of the risk that they may meet the same fate. They are right about that if they have a time-limited perspective on individuality. They consider the elderly, handicapped, ill or poor individual that may later occupy their body to be someone else.
In the past, persons were not considered responsible for the damage they caused while drunk. Apparently, in the drunk state, the body was considered not to hold the same individual as in the sober state.
One may assume that momentary madness can happen to everyone (something like a computer crash). The normal individual is considered absent from the body during that state of madness, and therefore not responsible. (Compare with temporary insanity[?] and automatism).
For example, in 1795 in England, a young woman who had taken good care of her ill mother for many years, suddenly killed her. It was considered that a momentary madness was caused by severe fatigue from her hard work. Especially the days before the awful event had been very hard, because of her mother's condition. The woman was not prosecuted. She later married and had children and never committed any crime.
In 1999 in the Netherlands, a young mother put her baby in the microwave instead of the baby's milk. The death of the baby was considered to be caused by a very unfortunate blackout. The mother was considered absent from the body when it happened. She was not prosecuted, but comforted for her loss.
- See also: Individualism, consciousness, absent seizure[?]
cometh a knight.html">knight.html">knight.html">knight.html">knight.html">knight.html">knight riding, will joust.html">joust.html">joust with you. Anon, as
knight that I saw lie by the well.html">well.html">well, neither sleeping nor
with the covered shield of azure, he is the king.html">king's son
great a lover.html">lover as I know, and he loveth the king's daughter
Tristram, an ye require him he will joust with you, and
ye that will not love no lady. Well, said Dinadan, now
spake on high and said: Sir knight, make thee ready to
to joust with other. Sir, said Epinegris, is that the rule of
or nill? As for that, said Dinadan, make thee ready, for
and met together so hard that Epinegris smote down Sir
said: How now, meseemeth the lover hath well sped.
go/good.html">good knight revenge me. Nay, said Sir Tristram, I will
go hence. God defend me, said Sir Dinadan, from thy
and so they departed. Well, said Sir Tristram, peradventure
me, said Dinadan, from thy fellowship, for Sir Tristram
then they departed. Sir, said Sir Tristram, yet it may
heard in that town.html">town great noise and cry. What is this
of this castle that hath been long among us, and right now
that our knight said that Sir Launcelot were a better
Sir Tristram, for to slay a good knight for to say well
men of the town. For an Sir Launcelot had been here
knights.
When Sir Tristram heard them say so he sent for his
overtaken them, and bade them turn and amend that they
one knight. And therewith they took their course, and
that knight over his horse's tail. Then the other knight
served the other knight. And then they gat off their
swords to do their battle to the utterance. Knights, said
.
On
wordlookup.net
All is still licensed under the GNU FDL.
It uses material from the wikipedia.
|
|