| word looked up : | home / archive |
Meeting systemA meeting system is any systemic means of improving meetings, workshops[?] or conferences[?]. They are particularly important in consensus decision making and deliberative democracy, but they have always been recognized as important to judicial procedure[?] and parliamentary procedure, down to the level of the town meeting[?] or below.There are many such systems, of which one of the best-known is probably Robert's Rules of Order, which is applied in parliamentary debate and corporate meetings in many English-speaking countries. Also well-known is the cross-examination debate[?] applied in both criminal law and civil law. Much innovation in meeting systems has come from objection to these two basic models, notably due to the fact that both reflect an adversarial process. When used in political or economic contexts, meeting systems are very often associated with a voting system. When used in matchmaking or other sexual/romantic contexts, a meeting system is considered a dating system. These are discussed in other articles. Accordingly, this article will focus on the corporate and organizational uses of a formal meeting system of rules and limits of debate, and of decision. Examples of meeting systems:
See also: decision theory[?], dating system, voting system. This great strike.html">strike.html">strike, one of
attention because of the issues involved, because a coal shortage
intervention of president.html">President Roosevelt. The central figure of this
years old, with the features of a scholar and the demeanor of an
veteran general.
At the beginning of the strike Mitchell, as president of the
grievances to an impartial arbitral tribunal and to abide by its
consider this proposal reacted powerfully in the strikers' favor
increasing daily in bitterness, multiplying the apprehension of
bore the increasing strain with his customary calmness and
Roosevelt called the mine owners and the union leaders to a
President afterwards remarked: "There was only one man in the
but gave the miners the bulk of their demands. The public
the leader who had won their first strike in a quarter of a
demeanor in the midst of the most harassing tensions of a class
testifying before the Anthracite Coal Strike Commission. Every
him failed to rule his temper or to lead him into damaging
John Mitchell's powerful hold upon public opinion today is not
business skill, nor his Irish gift of human accommodation, but to
responsibilities of leadership, that he realized the stern
the trade union policy of asking only for that which was
the world with all its progress has not made war. All is still licensed under the GNU FDL.
|
|
|||||