| word looked up : | home / archive |
Ethics : Moral philosophyEthics is a branch of philosophy which studies questions pertaining to right and wrong, good and bad. meta:Simple View of Ethics and Morals deals with these in much simpler language.When balances between these are considered, especially in public policy, ethics becomes politics. When religious concepts are considered to dominate over human conceptions of right and wrong, ethics are presumed to derive from a moral code - usually divinely inspired or revealed. Ethics is typically broken into at least four sub-disciplines, including meta-ethics, value theory, the theory of conduct, and applied ethics. Some view aesthetics and etiquette and arbitration as more fundamental, percolating 'bottom up' to imply, rather than explicitly state, theories of value or of conduct. In these views ethics isn't derived from a top-down philosophy but rather is strictly derived from observations of actual choices made in practice:
The rest of this article will focus on the formal academic categories above, which are derived from Early Greek philosophy[?], especially Aristotle. It will characterize the above variants as part of an 'applied ethics' in the terms that are developed using these terms: First, we need to define an "ethical sentence[?]", also called a normative statement. An ethical sentence is one that is used to make either a positive or a negative (moral) evaluation of something. Ethical sentences typically use words such as "good," "bad," "right," "wrong," "moral," "immoral," and so on. Here are some examples:
In contrast, a non-ethical sentence would be a sentence that does not serve to (morally) evaluate something. Examples would include:
Now letıs look at the four branches of ethics mentioned above. 1. Meta-ethics studies the nature of ethical sentences and attitudes. This includes such questions as what "good" and "right" mean, whether and how we know what is right and good, whether moral values are objective, and how ethical attitudes motivate us. Often this is derived from some list of moral absolutes, e.g. a religious moral code, whether explicit or not. Some would view aesthetics as itself a form of meta-ethics. 2. The theory of value, asks: "What sorts of things and situations are good?" For example, the following would be questions in the theory of value: "Is pleasure always good?", "Is it good, ceteris paribus, for people to be equally well-off?", "Is it intrinsically good for beautiful objects to exist?" If value can be quantified at all, it is implied that tradeoffs are at least possible - Kidder[?] would say implied. 3. The theory of conduct studies, on a general level, what sorts of actions are morally wrong, permissible, obligatory, and supererogatory (beyond the call of duty). So theories of conduct propose standards of morality, or moral codes or rules. For example, the following would be the sort of rules that a theory of conduct would discuss (though different theories will differ on the merit of each of these particular rules): "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you"; "The right action is the action that produces the greatest happiness for the greatest number"; "Stealing is wrong." Here is where it is difficult to distinguish a theory from practice of etiquette. 4. Applied ethics applies ethical theories to particular ethical problems. Many of these ethical problems bear directly on public policy. For example, the following would be questions of applied ethics: "Is getting an abortion ever moral?"; "Is euthanasia ever moral?"; "What are the ethical underpinnings of affirmative action policies?"; "Do animals have rights?" Without these questions there is no clear fulcrum on which to balance law, politics, and practice of arbitration - in fact no common assumptions of all participants - so the ability to formulate the questions are prior to rights balancing. But not all questions studied in applied ethics concern public policy. For example: Is lying always wrong? If not, when is it permissible? Clearly, it is permissible in some situations, at least by default, as research in anthropology shows that humans typically lie several times per day. Underlying patterns must somehow be detected by ourselves before we decide how truthful to be - else we could not manage the many and varying situations outlined in any social etiquette - so the ability to make these ethical judgements is prior to any etiquette. There are several sub-branches of applied ethics examining the ethical problems of different professions, such as business ethics, medical ethics, engineering ethics[?] and legal ethics[?], while technology assessment and environmental assessment[?] study the effects and implications of new technologies or projects on nature and society. These seek to characterize common issues and problems that arise in the ethical codes of the professions, and define their common responsibility to the public, e.g. to preserve its natural capital, or to obey some social expectations of honest dealings and disclosure. Casuistry is one approach to applied ethics. Bernard Crick[?] in 1982 offered a variant view, that politics was the only applied ethics, and that "political virtues" were in fact necessary in all matters where human morality and interests were destined to clash. The view that ethics is innate and tied to a personal moral core or aesthetics is harder to relate to the formal categories above other than as a meta-ethics in itself. It is considered by some ethicists to be just a variant of mysticism or narcissism, permitting those who avow aesthetic choices as being 'above ethics' to justify anything. See also: morality, epistemology, ontology, etiquette, Mussar movement (Jewish ethical movement), ethical code, moral code, bioethics, Utilitarian ethics, Henry Hazlitt, grey area. were present, and amongst others M. de Chauvelin, who told me that
wanting.
The Marquis and Marchioness de Prie were there also. The marquis
a rude gamester, who would not let the marquis's mistress look
the trick I had played her at Aix being probably enough to last
and I was glad to see the Chevalier Ville-Follet dancing.html">dancing with the
getting rid of Lord Percy, though she told him that she was fully
refreshments began to make their appearance. I was delighted to
liberality. The Piedmontese, who are great at calculations,
corks was continuous.
Feeling tired I asked Agatha to sit.html">sit down, and I was telling her
interrupted us. I rose to give them place, and Agatha imitated my
praised her dress, and above all the lace trimming. The other
that those imitation stones would lose their brilliance in time.
said that they would never lose their brilliance, as they were
heart confessed that they were imitation, and that I had lent.html">lent them
his caste does not lend imitation jewellery to such a pretty girl
she felt.html">felt that the fact of my having lent her such stones was a
partner executed the dance with wonderful grace. When it was over
remember our dancing together at Soleure, and that she hoped I
shewed her how flattered I felt by the compliment.
The ball did not come to an end till four o'clock in the morning,
with Madame Dupre.
I was still in bed the next morning, when my man told me a pretty
find it was Agatha's mother. I made her sit down beside me, and
ear-rings from her pocket, and said, with a smile, that she had
. All is still licensed under the GNU FDL.
|
|
|||||