| word looked up : | home / archive |
ReasonIn philosophy, reason (from Latin ratio, by way of French raison) is the faculty by means of which or the process through which human beings perform thought, especially abstract thought. Many thinkers have pondered reason, and the various views on the nature of reason may not be compatible with one another.Reason is sometimes narrowly defined as the faculty or process of drawing logical inferences. From Aristotle onwards, such reasoning has been classified as either deductive reasoning, meaning "from the general to the particular", or inductive reasoning, meaning "from the particular to the general". In the 19th century, Charles Peirce, an American philosopher, added a third classification, abductive reasoning, by which he meant "from the best available information to the best explanation", which has become an important component of the scientific method. In modern usage, "inductive reasoning" sometimes includes almost all non-deductive reasoning, including what Peirce would call "abductive". (See also logic, syllogism.) Reason has also been conceived more broadly. George Lakoff and Mark Johnson[?] explicate reason and its scope in this manner:
Reason is often opposed to sensation, perception, feeling, and desire. Rationalists see reason as the faculty by which fundamental truths are intuitively apprehended. These fundamental truths are the causes or "reasons" that things exist or happen. Empiricists, of course, deny the existence of such a faculty. For Immanuel Kant, reason (Vernunft in Kant's German language) is the power of synthesizing into unity, by means of comprehensive principles, the concepts provided by the intellect[?] (Verstand). The reason which gives a priori principles Kant calls "Pure Reason" (as in his The Critique of Pure Reason[?]), as distinguished from the "Practical Reason" which is specially concerned with the performance of particular actions. In theology, reason, as distinguished from faith, is the human intelligence exercised upon religious truth whether by way of discovery or by way of explanation. The limits within which reason may be used have been laid down differently in different churches and periods of thought: on the whole, modern Christianity, especially in the Protestant churches, tends to allow to reason a wide field, reserving, however, as the sphere of faith the ultimate (supernatural) truths of theology. Regardless of how it is conceived, reason has often been seen as a uniquely human trait, which separates us from the other animals. These days, the idea of reason as an independent faculty of the mind, separate from emotions, and unique to humanity, is under attack from a number of sources. Consider, for example, George Lakoff and Mark Johnson[?]'s theories about the "embodied mind". (See the Lakoff article for more information.) For a critique of reasons preeminent position within western culture since the renaissance see Voltaires Bastards[?] by John Ralston Saul.
References
HARTFORD, CONN., November 21, 1867.html">1867.
SAMUEL L. CLEMENS, ESQ.,
which we had recently written and were about to forward to you, not
obtaining from you a work of some kind, perhaps compiled from your
proper. We are the publishers of A. D. Richardson's works, and flatter
justice to his productions as any other house in the country. We are
failed to give a book.html">book.html">book an immense circulation. We sold about 100,000
are now printing 41,000 of 'Beyond the Mississippi', and large orders
do so, we should be pleased to see you, and will do so. Will you do us
Secretary.
After ten days' delay this letter was forwarded to the Tribune bureau in
WASHINGTON, December 2, 1867.
E. BLISS, JR., ESQ.,
rooms of the Tribune Bureau here. It was forwarded from the Tribune
sufficient apology for the seeming discourtesy of my silence.
I wrote fifty-two letters for the San Francisco Alta California during
thus far. The Alta has few exchanges in the East, and I suppose scarcely
Mountains. I could weed them of their chief faults of construction and
acceptable in many respects than any I could now write. When those
that freshness; they were warm then, they are cold now. I could strike
If you think such a book would suit your purpose, please drop me a line,
ought to be ready; whether it should have pictures in it or not; and
I might possibly make out of it. The latter clause has a degree of
understand that, of course.
I have other propositions for a book, but have doubted the propriety of
. All is still licensed under the GNU FDL.
|
|
|||||