Set theoretic intersection
In mathematics, the intersection of two sets A and B is the set that contains all elements of A that also belong to B (or equivalently, all elements of B that also belong to A), but no other elements. The intersection of A and B is written "A ∩ B". Formally:
- x is an element of A ∩ B if and only if
- x is an element of A and
- x is an element of B.
For example, the intersection of the sets {1,2,3} and {2,3,4} is {2,3}. The number 9 is not contained in the intersection of the set of prime numbers {2,3,5,7,11,...} and the set of odd numbers {1,3,5,7,9,11,...}.
More generally, one can take the intersection of several sets at once. The intersection of A, B, C, and D, for example, is A ∩ B ∩ C ∩ D = A ∩ (B ∩ (C ∩ D)). Intersection is an associative operation; thus, A ∩ (B ∩ C) = (A ∩ B) ∩ C.
The most general notion is the intersection of an arbitrary nonempty collection of sets. If M is a nonempty set whose elements are themselves sets, then x is an element of the intersection of M if and only if for every element A of M, x is an element of A. In symbols:
- <math>x \in \cap \mathbf{M} \leftrightarrow \forall A \in \mathbf{M}, \quad x \in A.</math>
This idea subsumes the above paragraphs, in that for example, A ∩ B ∩ C is the intersection of the collection {A,B,C}.
The notation for this last concept can vary considerably. Hardcore set theorists will simply write "∩M", while most people will instead write "∩A∈M A". The latter notation can be generalised to "∩i∈I Ai", which refers to the intersection of the collection {Ai : i ∈ I}. Here I is a nonempty set, and Ai is a set for every i in I.
In the case that the index set[?] I is the set of natural numbers, you might see notation analogous to that of summation:
- <math>\cap_{i=1}^{\infty} A_i</math>
When formatting is difficult, this can also be written "A1 ∩ A2 ∩ A3 ∩ ...", even though strictly speaking, A1 ∩ (A2 ∩ (A3 ∩ ... makes no sense. (This last example, an intersection of countably many sets, is actually very common; for an example see the article on σalgebras.)
Finally, let us note that whenever the symbol "∩" is placed before other symbols instead of between them, it should be of a larger size.
(Eventually this will be available in HTML as the character entity[?] ⋂, but until then, try <big>∩</big>.)
See also: Basic set theory
Oh sweetest, fayrest Lilly:
As when thou grew'st thy selfe
Bel. Oh Melancholly,
The Ooze, to shew what Coast thy sluggish care
Ioue knowes what man thou might'st haue made: but I,
How found you him?
Thus smiling, as some Fly had tickled slumber,
Reposing on a Cushion
Gui. Where?
His armes thus leagu'd, I thought he slept, and put
Answer'd my steps too lowd
Gui. Why, he but sleepes:
With female Fayries will his Tombe be haunted,
Whil'st Sommer lasts, and I liue heere, Fidele,
The Flower that's like thy face. Pale-Primrose, nor
The leafe of Eglantine, whom not to slander,
With Charitable bill.html">bill (Oh bill sore shaming
Without a Monument) bring thee all this,
To winter-ground thy Coarse-
And do not play in Wench-like words with that
And not protract with admiration, what
Gui. By good.html">good Euriphile, our Mother
Arui. Bee't so:
Haue got the mannish cracke, sing him to'th' ground
Saue that Euriphile, must be Fidele
Gui. Cadwall,
For Notes of sorrow, out of tune, are worse
Is quite forgot. He was a Queenes Sonne, Boyes,
He was paid for that: though meane, and mighty rotting
(That Angell of the world) doth make distinction
And though you tooke his life, as being our Foe,
Thersites body is as good as Aiax,
Wee'l say our Song the whil'st: Brother begin
Gui. Nay Cadwall, we must lay his head to th' East,
Nor the furious Winters rages,
Home art gon, and tane thy wages.
As Chimney-Sweepers come to dust
Arui. Feare no more the frowne.
On
wordlookup.net
All is still licensed under the GNU FDL.
It uses material from the wikipedia.
|
|