| word looked up : | home / archive |
Strike actionStrike action (or simply strike) is a deliberate refusal to work on the part of multiple employees. This is a tactic often employed by labor unions during collective bargaining with an employer[?]. If a strike takes place against the will of the leadership of the union, or without a union, it's known as a wildcat strike. In many countries, wildcat strikes do not enjoy the same legal protections as standard union strikes, and may result in penalties for the union whose members participate. A strike may consist of workers refusing to attend work or picketing outside the workplace so as to prevent or dissuade other people from working in their place or conducting business with their employer. Or, a strike may consist of workers attending or occupying the workplace, but refusing to do their jobs or leave. This is known as a sit-down strike.Strikes may be specific to a particular workplace, employer, or unit within a workplace, or they may encompass an entire industry, or every worker within a city or country. Strikes that involve all workers are known as general strikes. When an employer prevents employees from working, this is known as a lockout; collectively, lockouts and strikes are known as work stoppages[?]. Strikes first became important during the industrial revolution, when mass labour became important in factories and mines.
One of the features of the earlier numbers was a
which speedily involved the author in actual hostilities with the
publishing certain impudent lucubrations in the _London Daily
Smollett, whom he (Fielding) had ridiculed in his second number, perhaps
Pickle_, to which reference was made in an earlier chapter. Smollett,
venomous pamphlet, in which, under the name of "Habbakkuk Hilding,
brutality. Another, and seemingly unprovoked, adversary whom the
joint-author with George Colman of the _Connoisseur_, who, in a
lampooned Sir Alexander with remarkable rancour and assiduity. Mr.
they also have some record in the curious collections of the elder
more scrupulous in his choice of weapons than those who assailed him;
"neither party would obtain honour by an inquiry into the cause or
proportion be observed) to assign any real importance to efforts like
insignificant enough. But even the worst work of such a man is notable
means to be despised. They are shrewd lay sermons, often exhibiting much
personal qualities. In No. 33, on "Profanity," there is a character-
there is also a very thoughtful paper on "Reading," containing a kindly
mollified that implacable moralist. In this essay it is curious to
and Moliere, Lucian, Cervantes, and Swift, he condemns Rabelais and
Jones_, he had included both these authors among the models he admired.
because it affords a clue to a project of Fielding's which unfortunately
undertaken in conjunction with his old colleague, the Rev. William
by a "puff preliminary," in which Fielding, while abstaining. All is still licensed under the GNU FDL.
|
|
|||||