Vagueness
Ambiguity is one way in which the meanings of words and phrases can be unclear, but there is another way, which is different from ambiguity, namely vagueness. This is best explained by the use of a stock example: 'bald'. Some men are definitely bald, and there is no debating the matter; for example, Patrick Stewart (Captain Picard of Star Trek). Other men are definitely not bald; for example, Bill Clinton. Then there are quite a few men who carefully comb a scanty amount of hair over their scalps, about whom we are not sure whether to say they are bald or not. There just isn't any clear line between being bald and not being bald.Another good example of a vague concept is the concept of a heap--two or three grains of sand isn't a heap, but a thousand is. So how many grains of sand does it take to make a heap? There is no clear line. (See the paradox of the heap.)
When we look at a man with thinning hair or a small pile of sand, and we do not know whether to call the man 'bald', or the sand a 'heap', then we have found a borderline case. So we can make a general principle, which in fact might work as a definition of the word 'vague':
- To say a term, or a concept, is vague is to say it has, in addition to clear cases where it does and doesn't apply, borderline cases as well; in other words, cases where there is no clear fact of the matter whether the concept applies or not.
It turns out that vagueness is important philosophically. Suppose we want to come up with a definition of 'right' in a moral sense of this term. Generally, we can say that we want a definition to cover actions that are clearly right and exclude actions who are clearly wrong; but then what do we do with the borderline cases of actions that are neither clearly right nor clearly wrong? Surely there are such cases. What philosophers often say is that we should try to come up with a definition that is itself unclear on just those cases that are borderline cases. Others say that we have an interest in making our definitions more precise than ordinary language, or our ordinary concepts, would by themselves allow; they recommend that we advance so-called precising definitions[?]. So some philosophers want their definitions to be unclear in precisely those areas in which the ordinary concept to be defined is unclear; while other philosophers want their definitions to be more precise than the ordinary concepts.
This endeavour failed,
Next day this body of sailors set.html">set off for Newcastle; but learning,
civil force prepared to receive them there, they dispersed for the
the drums of the North Yorkshire militia.html">militia beating to arms, and the
the alarm, and some of them seeing the militia, under the command of
Gate to the house of rendezvous for impressed seamen in the Broad
for the insults they had been subjected to in North Shields. In the
stationed at Tynemouth barracks; the press.html">press-gangs belonging to armed
circle could escape, and upwards of two hundred and fifty men,
board the armed ships. With that prize they set sail, and wisely
them. Not all the dread of an invasion by the French could reconcile
confusion prevailed after this to within many miles of the
dispersed like a covey of birds, because a press-gang was reported
returned to work on the assurance from the steward of his master's
stables or outhouses belonging to their landlord, not daring.
On
wordlookup.net
All is still licensed under the GNU FDL.
It uses material from the wikipedia.
|
|